A2RU
A2RU

Ground Works

An online selection of exemplary arts-inclusive research projects, and a platform for reflection on the processes that drive interdisciplinary collaborative work.

Our Mission

Ground Works promotes research-based, interdisciplinary collaborations through the rigorously peer-reviewed presentation of arts-inclusive work and guided reflection on the processes that support it. The goal of Ground Works is to cultivate a robust, critical community of practice in support of such work, while documenting and sharing effective practices for interdisciplinary collaboration.

Visit Ground Works

Why Now?

From a2ru’s inception, its partner organizations have asked for one place to find outstanding examples of work that integrates research and practice in the fine, performing, and applied arts and design with other disciplines. Ground Works not only provides a gallery of such work; it advances interdisciplinary research with the arts by requiring rigorous peer review for inclusion on the platform.

Ground Works peer review is critical because while researchers, scholars, and practitioners engage in arts-inclusive collaborations from both within and beyond the academy, many depend on academic review for the establishment of rigor and impact. However, arts-integrative research and creative work pose a challenge to traditional peer review methods because of their multiple disciplinary perspectives. While standards for peer review in disciplinary publication are clearly established (although hotly debated), criteria for high-quality peer review of arts-integrative work have not been well articulated. The Ground Works staff recognizes the emergent nature of these standards and takes responsibility for their integrity through a collaborative editorial process.

Content: What do we promote?

Ground Works showcases projects that demonstrate:

  • Arts-inclusive focus
  • Interdisciplinarity
  • Maturity, with external recognition
  • A research component
  • Innovative process or outcomes
  • Contribution to the fields represented, or to the understanding of conversation among those fields
  • Understanding of context and precedent
  • Accessible to a broad audience

Ground Works welcomes traditional forms – performances, exhibitions, compositions, publications, or designed and built projects – that also contribute to fields for which such forms are not typical, as well as contributions that demonstrate experimental, non-traditional, or atypical approaches.

Process

Submissions have the following workflow:

  • Suitability Review (14-day turnaround) – New submissions are reviewed by Editors to ensure a fit with the scope of the journal and goal of showcasing compelling interdisciplinary explorations. Submissions to this stage constitute a “letter of interest” with only a short project summary required. Our aim is that this review stage can be completed quickly.
  • Project Review (1–3-month turnaround) – Projects that progress to the second stage are asked to provide a 1,000-word narrative and rich media to accompany their submission. A team of peer Reviewers then evaluate the project and provide feedback. Successful projects are included in our online compendium of projects and invited to contribute reflections on effective practice in their process.

Supporting a Community of Practice

Ground Works is committed to fostering connections among those researchers working across the arts and other disciplines and to mentoring promising projects to publication. Here are some of the ways we do this:

  • Reviewers participate in a social and collaborative review of submissions. Through these editorial conversations, reviewers connect to other researchers in their own and in adjacent fields, engaging in lively discussion about new work and its relationship to the field.
  • Ground Works sponsors public conversations about the work of arts-integrative research. These may be live or virtual, with a range of topics, venues, and scales. You can see a video from our first such event, Dear Arts Integration Community. Kevin Hamilton moderated this conversation, which included the CERN-IARI team (a physicist, curator, video artist, and mathematician working at the University of Kansas Integrated Arts Initiative), Mary Beth Leigh, Edgar Cardenas, and the public.
  • Ground Works authors are encouraged to reflect on their working processes and share those reflections on the site. Author Benjamin David Robert Bogart offers one such reflection on his Ground Works entry “Machines that Dream.”
  • Reviewers practice a mentoring style of review, treating submissions as though they were the work of a colleague whose work they want to help succeed. Some reviewers offer to continue working with submitters beyond their initial feedback on the project, serving in a mentoring capacity.

 

Banner Image Credit: Phulkari, photo by Andrew Howell; project funded by ArtsEmgine at the University of Michigan. 

a2ru Ground Works Advisory Board

The Advisory Board makes recommendations on matters that define Ground Works–inclusion, access, audience, editorial approach, and sustainability.

The 2022 Advisory Board includes:

Cheryl Ball
Director of the Digital Publishing Collaborative
Wayne State University Libraries

Stephen David Beck
Associate Vice President for Research & Economic Development
Haymon Professor of Music
Louisiana State University

Julian Chambliss
Department of English
Core Faculty, Consortium for Critical Diversity in Digital Age Research (CEDAR)
Val Berryman Curator of History, MSU Museum
Michigan State University

 

Shannon Criss
Professor of Architecture
School of Architecture and Design
University of Kansas

Kevin Hamilton
Professor and Dean
College of Fine and Applied Arts
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Roger F. Malina
Endowed Chair of Art and Technology and Professor of Physics
University of Texas at Dallas

Executive Editor of Leonardo Publications
Founder of Leonardo/ISAST and Leonardo/OLATS

a2ru Ground Works Editorial Board

The Editorial Board is tasked with balancing the rigor of a peer-reviewed journal with a mentoring, pedagogical approach. They review all Stage 1 submissions, in some cases oversee a project’s progress through Stage 2, and forge connections between Ground Works and their respective fields

The 2022 Editorial Board includes:

Audrey G. Bennett
University of Michigan

Ivica Ico Bukvic
Virginia Tech

Rodrigo Cádiz
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Kyrie E. H. Caldwell
University of Wisconsin-Madison

J.R. Campbell
Kent State University

Edgar Cardenas
Michigan State University

Robin Cass
Rochester Institute of Technology

Oubi Craig
University of Florida

Lake Douglas
Louisiana State University

Zach Duer
Virginia Tech

Cassandra Fraser
University of Virginia

Eric Handman
University of Utah

Alexandra Harbold
University of Utah

Shumaila Hemani
University of Alberta

Mihyun Kang
Penn State University

Julian Kilker
University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Jinku Kim
University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Aaron D. Knochel
Penn State University

Samantha Lazar
Dartmouth

Amy Lorek
Penn State University

Olivia Lucas
Louisiana State University

Gerald Maa
University of Georgia

Mary Pat McGuire
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Meridith Beck Mink
University of Wisconsin-Madison

Maria C. Olivares
Boston University

Kirsi Peltomäki
Oregon State University

María Isabel García Pérez de Arce
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Nicole Hodges Persley
University of Kansas

Nathan Platte
University of Iowa

Julia M. Ritter
Rutgers University

Rebecca Salzer
University of Alabama

Lourdes Santamaría-Wheeler
University of Florida

Garrett Schumann
Independent Scholar

Laura Shackelford
Rochester Institute of Technology

Stephen Taylor
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Thomas Tucker
Virginia Tech

Jacqueline Wernimont
Dartmouth